Precedents

1982 - 2010

With the precedent of the confrontation between liberal and conservative guerrillas of the “La Violencia” era in Colombia, the armed confrontation between the Colombian State and the FARC-EP dates back to the 1960s with the formation of the guerrilla group in 1964, and the evolution and deployment of its guerrilla structures in different regions of the country during the following decades. 

Exploratory Phase

2010 - 2012

The Exploratory phase of the talks between the Colombian Government and the FARC-EP took place between September 2010 and August 2012.  It all began with an exchange of letters and communications – through third party delegates – and ended with the General Agreement to End the Armed Conflict and Build a Stable and Lasting Peace, which guided the course and rules of the talks during the public stage. 

What was the origin of the dialogues between the Colombian Government and the FARC-EP in 2012?

Conversations Phase

2012 - 2016

On October 18, 2012, the Negotiations Table was installed, thus initiating the public phase of the process to be carried out in Havana, with the objective of reaching agreements on the six points of the agenda. On August 24, 2016, a first Final Agreement was reached, which was signed in Cartagena a month later.

The challenges of negotiating during wartime

Renegotiation Phase

2016

Following the Constitutional Court’s endorsement to establish a mechanism for citizen endorsement of what was agreed in Havana (Cuba), on October 2, 2016, the Plebiscite for peace was held. Colombians were asked: “Do you support the final agreement to end the conflict and build a stable and lasting peace?”. 6,431,376 citizens (50.21%) voted “No” and 6,377,482 (49.78%) “Yes”. In view of the disapproval of the Agreement, the Colombian government activated a Great National Dialogue with the purpose of collecting proposals for adjustments and clarifications from sectors that had voted in favor and against the Agreement. With these proposals, the government and FARC-EP sat down again in Havana to build a new agreement to be reached on November 12, 2016.  

How was the Peace Agreement renegotiated?

Implementation Phase

2016 - present

With the endorsement of the Final Agreement through the Congress of the Republic, the Implementation phase of the Agreement began on December 1, 2016. Among the first milestones of the implementation, the Commission for Monitoring, Promotion and Verification of Implementation (CSIVI) and the National Council for Reincorporation (CNR) were created as joint government and FARC-EP bodies to monitor the implementation process. 

Political Participation

may, 2013 - november, 2013

Item 2 contains the agreement regarding political participation. This agreement is a unique opportunity to advance in the broadening and deepening of our democratic system.

Though the nation took big steps toward a true democratic opening with the 1991 Political Constitution—allowing new political parties and movements to enter the political arena, as well as proclaiming fundamental values and principles that have strengthened political institutions—, many of those values and principles have not materialized, largely due to the internal armed conflict. As such, it was necessary to reach some agreements regarding this subject.

Leer más

This agreement is built upon three ideas:

  1. A new democratic openness is necessary to promote political inclusion and allow new voices and new political projects to emerge. This political inclusion must carry complete guarantees of transparency and equity in the rules of the game, so that new voices and projects competing in the democratic arena can reach consensus regarding important national concerns and can enrich debate.

There is a need for reforms that establish rights and guarantees for the exercise of political opposition, in general, and for new movements that emerge, in particular, after the signing of the Final Agreement. The main objective of this is to sever the connection between politics and arms.

Those guarantees include, among other things: the safety of vulnerable groups that intend to participate in national, regional or local politics, in any sector; equitable access to financing and media, whereby political minorities can exercise their legitimate right to opposition; and the guarantees necessary for entering and remaining within the democratic establishment, since the current rules for political participation work against minority groups and hinder a consistent party line.

Finally, considering that many of the regions that were most directly affected by the conflict were not able to have meaningful representation within institutions like the Congress of the Republic, and with the goal of promoting political inclusion, the agreement created Special Transitional Peace Constituencies for certain regions to elect additional representatives in the Chamber.

  1. The consolidation of peace also requires greater citizen participation, in accordance with the spirit of the 1991 Constitution.

Peace is built by people in their lands. To make this possible, there must be a strengthening of participatory processes, not only to ensure that participation is an effective means of formulating policies and implementing the agreements, but also so that individuals can negotiate their public demands in an effective way and, ultimately, contribute to the collective construction of peace “from the bottom up.”

The aim is for citizens to actively participate in decision making, as well as to evaluate and monitor the affairs of those who govern. Inasmuch as citizens feel they are a part of the decisions that affect them and can direct their concerns through democratic channels, this is a guarantee of non-repetition of the violence

  1. The basic condition for consolidating peace, through the exercise of democracy, consists in permanently breaking the link between politics and arms. This means that weapons will never again be used to promote a political cause and, likewise, that whoever has laid down arms, to transition to politics, is fully guaranteed his or her safety and will not be a victim of violence.

The preceding applies not only to those who have laid down arms, but to all those who are politically active. This concerns nothing less than dignifying and protecting political exercise as a pillar of constructing peace.

At the same time, it is necessary to strengthen guarantees for political opposition, thus creating conditions more favorable to the exercise of basic democratic principles, like the transfer of power.

Special Transitory Peace Electoral Districts

Video

Peace electoral districts, an opportunity for the territories

The Special Transitory Peace Electoral Districts (CITREP) are a recent development in Colombian democracy aimed at expanding political representation in those municipalities historically affected by the armed conflict through the assignment of 16 seats in the House of Representatives.  In force until 2030, this mechanism contains several particularities that reflect the vision of the Final […]

Opposition Statute

Video

Opposition Statute: a promise fulfilled

The strengthening of democracy is one of the central purposes of the 2016 Final Agreement for the transformation of the political conditions that facilitated the persistence of the armed conflict in Colombia for decades. One of the measures contemplated in the Agreement, taken from the 1991 Constitution, is the Opposition Statute, a figure in force […]

Political Reincorporation of the FARC-EP

Video

From the armed fight to the political struggle: the creation of the Comunes Party

One of the central elements of the 2016 Final Agreement has to do with the conditions that allow the transition of the FARC-EP from an illegal armed group to an unarmed political organization or movement. The political Reincorporation of the FARC-EP, as a measure for non-repetition of the armed conflict, contemplated a series of legal, […]

Related content

Infographic

Everything about Political Participation in the Final Agreement

Learn more about Item 2 of the Final Agreement, which includes guarantees for the exercising of political opposition, the strengthening of citizen participation and the broadening of political participation. The translation of this piece was made possible thanks to the support of the Embassy of Canada in Colombia.
Infographic

The citizen’s voice in the item about Political Participation

Learn more about the characteristics and scope of citizen participation regarding the Political Participation in the Final Agreement: who participated, the team in charge of the coordination, how plural participation was guaranteed, the methodologies and the results. The translation of this piece was made possible thanks to the support of the Embassy of Canada in […]

Historical Archive