Precedents

1982 - 2010

With the precedent of the confrontation between liberal and conservative guerrillas of the “La Violencia” era in Colombia, the armed confrontation between the Colombian State and the FARC-EP dates back to the 1960s with the formation of the guerrilla group in 1964, and the evolution and deployment of its guerrilla structures in different regions of the country during the following decades. 

Exploratory Phase

2010 - 2012

The Exploratory phase of the talks between the Colombian Government and the FARC-EP took place between September 2010 and August 2012.  It all began with an exchange of letters and communications – through third party delegates – and ended with the General Agreement to End the Armed Conflict and Build a Stable and Lasting Peace, which guided the course and rules of the talks during the public stage. 

What was the origin of the dialogues between the Colombian Government and the FARC-EP in 2012?

Conversations Phase

2012 - 2016

On October 18, 2012, the Negotiations Table was installed, thus initiating the public phase of the process to be carried out in Havana, with the objective of reaching agreements on the six points of the agenda. On August 24, 2016, a first Final Agreement was reached, which was signed in Cartagena a month later.

The challenges of negotiating during wartime

Renegotiation Phase

2016

Following the Constitutional Court’s endorsement to establish a mechanism for citizen endorsement of what was agreed in Havana (Cuba), on October 2, 2016, the Plebiscite for peace was held. Colombians were asked: “Do you support the final agreement to end the conflict and build a stable and lasting peace?”. 6,431,376 citizens (50.21%) voted “No” and 6,377,482 (49.78%) “Yes”. In view of the disapproval of the Agreement, the Colombian government activated a Great National Dialogue with the purpose of collecting proposals for adjustments and clarifications from sectors that had voted in favor and against the Agreement. With these proposals, the government and FARC-EP sat down again in Havana to build a new agreement to be reached on November 12, 2016.  

How was the Peace Agreement renegotiated?

Implementation Phase

2016 - present

With the endorsement of the Final Agreement through the Congress of the Republic, the Implementation phase of the Agreement began on December 1, 2016. Among the first milestones of the implementation, the Commission for Monitoring, Promotion and Verification of Implementation (CSIVI) and the National Council for Reincorporation (CNR) were created as joint government and FARC-EP bodies to monitor the implementation process. 

Solution to the Problem of Illicit Drugs

november, 2013 - may, 2014

Item 4 contains the agreement regarding the solution to the problem of illicit drugs, which promotes a distinct and differentiated treatment of the phenomena of consumption, the problem of illicit crops, and the organized crime associated with drug trafficking. This agreement additionally ensures a general focus on human rights and public health with differentiated gender and ethnicity perspectives.

Given that the cultivation, production and commercialization of illicit drugs has intersected, fueled and financed the internal conflict, resolving the drug problem in these regions contributes to non-repetition of the conflict.

Leer más

The need to transform conditions of poverty, marginalization, and weak institutional presence in these regions must be acknowledged, while also recognizing that criminal organizations dedicated to drug trafficking continue to operate there. This acknowledgement should help place affected regions and peoples at the center of the solution.

The agreed upon solution to the problem of illicit drugs contains the following items:

  1. Substitution and Eradication of Illicit Crops.

The solution is based on a new Comprehensive National Program for Illicit Crop Substitution and Alternative Development. This program does not simply eradicate illicit crops or pay peasants for eradicating them, rather it works together with communities to resolve the problem of land ownership and crop cultivation under a rationale of cooperative land-use planning and social inclusion.

The program seeks to resolve the problem of cultivation through Voluntary substitution, because, on the one hand, it is essential that communities have an express will to pursue alternatives to the growing of crops destined for illicit use. And, on the other hand, the government has an obligation to generate and guarantee dignified living and working conditions for Well-being and quality of life.

The ideal for the program is that all substitution should be voluntary. In cases where the growers do not wish to participate or do not fulfill their commitments, eradication will be manually performed, and in any other case as well, local circumstances permitting. Spraying will be an extraordinary recourse under this strategy.

  1. Demining.

A tremendous obstacle for voluntary crop substitution, and for implementing the agreements generally, is the presence of mines in these regions. Thus, the Government is committed to launching a sweeping and demining program for regions of the nation that were affected by the placement of antipersonnel mines and unexploded ordnances. This program will rely not only on contributions from the government, but from the FARC-EP as well, through different means, including by supplying information.

  1. Public Health Programs and Programs to Prevent Drug Use.

This item proposes separating the treatment of drug use from the persecution of organized crime and developing a national policy regarding the consumption of illicit drugs that has a differential and gender perspective. It should be based on evidence and built and implemented with community participation.

To achieve the goals of a policy to promote health, prevention, comprehensive care and social inclusion, with special emphasis on children and adolescents, requires the commitment and joint labor of authorities, communities and families.

  1. Solution to the Phenomenon of Production and Commercialization of Narcotics.

Few problems have caused as much damage and pain for this country as drug trafficking has. The agreement for the end of the conflict severs the potential relationship between drug trafficking and political violence. Also, by removing crops, it removes part of the fuel for drug trafficking and, as such, for violence. Substantially reducing the financial resources of criminal organizations is also a measure for non-repetition.

It is essential to dismantle the deeply embedded mafias that threaten the construction of peace. The government will concentrate all of its possible resources against organized crime and, additionally, will revise and establish strict state controls over production, importation and commercialization of chemical supplies and precursors. All of this protects the substitution program, the implementation of the agreements, and the safety of these communities.

Finally, the identification and monitoring of money laundering operations must be improved. All institutions that exercise surveillance over different aspects of the economy must act against money laundering and firmly apply civil forfeiture to the goods they find.

  1. International Dimension.

A definitive, or at least more reasonable, solution to the drug problem is not possible without consensus between societies and a closer cooperation between nations. To that end, the government will promote an international conference, within the framework of the United Nations, to reflect on and objectively evaluate drug policy and to move forward with building consensus in regards to the changes that need to be made. This conference should address recent international discussions and developments in the subject, the perspectives of producer and consumer countries—especially the experiences and lessons learned in Colombia—, and the identification of best practices based on evidence.

Related content

Infographic

Everything about the Solution to the Illicit Drugs Problem in the Final Agreement

Learn more about the implementation of the ceasefire between the Colombian State and the FARC-EP and the prLearn more about Item 4 of the Final Agreement, which includes the substitution of crops used for illicit purposes, public health measures to prevent drug use, and solutions to the phenomenon of production and commercialization of narcotics. The […]
Infographic

The citizen’s voice in item about the Solution to the Illicit Drugs Problem

Learn more about the characteristics and scope of citizen participation regarding the Solution to the Illicit Drugs Problem in the Final Agreement: who participated, the team in charge of the coordination, how plural participation was guaranteed, the methodologies and the results. The translation of this piece was made possible thanks to the support of the […]

Historic Archive

Archivo histórico

VER TODO
Renegotiation Phase (August 27-November 30, 2016)

National Forum on the Solution to the Illicit Drugs Problem

Conversations Phase (August 27, 2012-August 26, 2016)

The delegations announce the agreement on item 4

Conversations Phase (August 27, 2012-August 26, 2016)

Boost towards a new international debate about the fight against illicit drugs

Conversations Phase (August 27, 2012-August 26, 2016)

Document on extradition and drug-trafficking

Conversations Phase (August 27, 2012-August 26, 2016)

President Juan Manuel Santos announces agreement on Point 4

Renegotiation Phase (August 27-November 30, 2016)

National forum on Point 4

Implementation Phase (December 1, 2016-present)

The Negotiation: Making Peace is More Difficult than Waging War

Conversations Phase (August 27, 2012-August 26, 2016)

What does the point on drugs say in the Peace Agreement?